Sexual Liberation is Fascism
Unfortunately, once sex and reproduction are divorced from Marriage the State will replace the family as our basic social grammar. This is the logic of liberalism, its concept of equality ends in biopolitical terrorism. Because the inequality of men and women concerning birth rights cannot be reconciled, the state will step in, and we will officially have to adopt our children from the State.
This is also why the state and corporations care so much about gay marriage - it exhibits the same problems, a homosexual couple cannot give birth, this is unjust and unequal because biology no longer defines us (transgender rights) therefore the simple biological linkage does not make one a father or mother. Thus the state will expand its power over our reproductive rights.
The third Factor is screening for diseases before the baby is born, since it costs taxpayers money to care for these children. As we speak artificial wombs are being created in Australia where scientists can screen and grow fetuses in a optimally healthy manner.
All three factors together make necessary the state to govern birth instead of the family. This results in a totalitarian fascism where human relationships are mediated by an all encompassing State.
As Heidegger said, technology will not be used by an elite to change our behavior to fit into an economic or cultural system that benefits them like in Brave New World, rather, we ourselves will internalize these ideologies and beg the technicians to make us like that.
So, women themselves fight for these arrangements, fiercely arguing that this is what they want, while their happiness plummets and the sexual marketplace they themselves fought for eats them alive.
“The great majority of people ± men as well as women ± are today integrated through seduction rather than policing, advertising rather than indoctrinating....The overall outcome is the rapid emaciation of human relations, stripping them of intimacy and emotionality, and the wilting of the desire to enter them and keep them alive.
The weakening of bonds is an important condition of successful social production of sensation-gatherers who happen as well to be fully ̄edged, effective consumers."
- Zygmunt Bauman
John Milkbank has explicitly called sexual liberation a form of fascism, when asked why this is what he said :
JM: Human fulfillment lies more in the direction of faithful love and inserting oneself in the continuity of generations. Marriage and the family, for all their corruption and misuse, are at base democratic institutions. Fascism for me comes into the picture because I think (following Adorno, amongst others) that the gradual separation of sex from procreation is regarded naively if we do not realize that this is what the state wants. Covertly, it wants to secure “Malthusian” control over reproduction and to deal with the individual directly, rather than through the mediation of couples. Much of liberal feminism is actually, in practice, on the side of economic and political neoliberalism. It is too rarely noticed that sexual permissiveness has today become a kind of opiate that covertly reconciles people to the loss of other freedoms—both in relation to the state and to the workplace.