Below is
1) an introduction explaining about the interpretation of the Book of Job
2)a brief summery and paraphrase of the commentary that appeared before the book of Job in many Bibles
3) For the intrepid reader, a modernized truncated version of the commentary
For the truly intrepid, you can read the whole thing in its original HERE and HERE.
Part I
The Book of Job has always been read in context. For example, it was traditionally accompanied by what has been called the “legend of Job,” in which superlative patience is indeed Job’s defining trait. The legend may even have come first, with the Book of Job (or at least its poetic diatribes) added later as an angry, satiric subversion. The story of the patient Job was strong enough to lead the early fifth-century commentator Theodore of Mopsuestia to argue against the canonicity of the Book of Job. He thought the now-scriptural account to be a slander on the name of a historical hero.
As Mark Lattimore explains:
“The Testament of Job was among the texts removed from the Apocrypha by Pope Gelasius in the fifth century CE, but it evidently lived on: someone thought it important enough to produce the tenth-century copy that is the earliest surviving manuscript. It remains our fullest exposition of the legend of Job. Many of the details that set it apart from the canonical book are constants in the iconographic tradition of Job, from the royal status of Job and his friends to his experience with worms on a dung heap.*”
James Kugel describes four defining assumptions that shaped the early interpreters’ approach to Scripture:
They assumed that the Bible was a fundamentally cryptic text—that is, when it said A, it often really meant B.
They assumed that the Bible was a book of lessons directed to readers in their own day. It may seem to talk about the past, but it is not fundamentally history; it is instruction.
They assumed that the Bible contained no contradictions or mistakes.
Lastly, they believed that the entire Bible was divinely given, a book in which God speaks directly or through His prophets.
These assumptions are what “made the Bible the Bible.” They explain its enduring status, but also suggest why modern faith in clear, literal meaning has made interpretation more brittle. Approaching Scripture as “cryptic, relevant, perfect, and divinely granted” challenged readers to examine it closely. Every incongruity or repetition—the sort of thing modern readers might call a scribal error—was instead a clue. Meaning was hidden beneath the surface, and any question raised by Scripture had to be answered within Scripture itself, though not necessarily in the same place.
Later traditions changed this approach: the Reformation emphasized that the biblical text speaks unaided; the Enlightenment taught that we could set aside prejudice; Romanticism urged readers to empathize with the author; Fundamentalism treated meaning as literal and univocal; and the New Critics argued that every work of genius is a self-contained world of meaning.
The Alexandrian school, by contrast, focused on the multiple senses of Scripture. The “literal” or “historical” sense—what the words say—was only one layer. The “moral” sense provided models for conduct; the “allegorical” sense revealed Christ or the Church; and the “anagogical” sense disclosed the soul’s journey toward God. In this way, the historical meaning could be deepened—or even overturned.
Lattimore continues:
“The forms in which people encountered Scripture emphasized that it was part of a library of sacred books (biblia, from the Greek plural). Until very recently, it was thought impossible to read unaided. The Bible was never read in a linear way, one book after another, yet its organization remained significant and much discussed. For most of its history, encountering the biblical text on its own was nearly impossible. Scripture differed from merely human literature through its depth of meaning, which demanded elaborate commentary. Manuscripts and early printed editions were often surrounded by so many layers of commentary that the biblical words themselves seemed mere islands in a sea of marginal notes.”
A typical Bible would open Job with a double prologue by Jerome—one on the Septuagint, the other on the Hebrew text—followed by a second exposition, two prefaces by Nicholas de Lyra, and an anonymous addition. Then came the “Prothemata in Job,” based on Gregory the Great’s Moralia. Only after all this did the text itself begin, and even then, progress was slow: pages of commentary might analyze every word of “There was a man in the land of Uz whose name was Job” (1:1).
One manuscript page shows Job’s children feasting as a symbol of the heavenly banquet, supported by an image of Christ gathering the blessed in His mantle. The commentary explains that Job’s sons “are the holy ones who held feasts daily… so they could come to eternal joy and enjoy God forever.” That the children soon die during one of their feasts is beside the point; this is an image of heaven. The number of sons and daughters—seven and three—is what matters, as well as the fact that they feasted daily.
The commentary included in most Bibles was that of Gregory the Great. Gregory urged readers to “put aside the chaff of the history and feed on the grain of mysteries.” The literal sense was a husk concealing deeper truths. For instance, when Job scratches his sores with a potsherd (Job 2:8), Gregory sees at one level a broken shard of pottery with a sharp edge, reminding Job that he too is made of clay. At a deeper, allegorical level, Christ Himself is the one scraping, and also the potsherd—He has taken the “clay of our nature,” hardened by the fire of His Passion, to scrape away sin. Finally, at the moral level, the potsherd represents the severity with which we must examine ourselves, its edge reminding us of our mortality.
Though Gregory’s Moralia in Job is ostensibly about moral life, the allegorical sense is central. Christ’s Passion, not merely His teaching, enables moral transformation. For Gregory, Job is a prophet who prefigures Christ even in his suffering. Allegory is not just a way of reading texts, but a way of reading reality.
When Job curses the day of his birth (Job 3), Gregory insists that he condemns not God but the fallen world. Job cannot literally curse a day that no longer exists; instead, he symbolically longs for the end of mortal existence and the dawning of eternity. The apparent contradictions of the text are deliberate—signs pointing to deeper truths.
Later, Gregory interprets God’s speeches as unveiling the Church’s spiritual army, destined to triumph over Satan and Antichrist. Job learns that even his righteousness cannot save him alone: “What commonly slays a soul more fatally than consciousness of virtue?” For Gregory, the greatest danger is not suffering but tranquility. “Lucky,” he writes, “are those to whom God sends the wake-up call of suffering.” Prosperity may conceal spiritual peril; adversity may reveal divine favor.
This layered reading may seem puzzling to modern minds. After all, God Himself tells us in Job that the friends are wrong—yet Paul quotes Eliphaz approvingly (1 Corinthians 3:19). Gregory explains that, at the historical level, Job’s friends are genuine companions. Their words contain no error in themselves. But at the allegorical level, they represent heresy: those who mix truth and falsehood. A true friend in one sense can symbolize a false teacher in another.
To illustrate this inversion, Gregory recalls David’s sin against Uriah (2 Samuel 11). Historically, David’s act is vile and Uriah’s innocence pure. Allegorically, however, David represents Christ—the “Strong-handed One”—who unites the Law (Bathsheba) to Himself, while Uriah represents the Jewish people, faithful to the letter but blind to the spirit. What is foul in history becomes holy in mystery.
Gregory’s purpose in invoking such shocking reversals is to teach that the Book of Job operates in an “inverted world.” The historical is not to be trusted when it conflicts with the spiritual. Job’s wife, friends, and sufferings all symbolize the fallen human condition. Through suffering, Job “beheld the truth with the eye within” and discerned the darkness of his own humanity, leading him to repentance “in dust and ashes.”
The world is gravely disordered, yet not hopelessly so. Prosperity can be a trap; friendship can conceal heresy. But by threshing out the “historical chaff,” believers can glimpse divine restoration. Even heretics, Gregory says, will ultimately be offered forgiveness, and the Jews, too, will return at the end of days. The sacrifices Job offers for his friends prefigure this reconciliation, and their gifts—sheep and earrings of gold—symbolize obedience, innocence, and humility.
For Gregory, allegory is not decorative poetry but revelation. It shows the true nature of a world where “the grandeur of God flames out, like shining from shook foil.” The Book of Job becomes a guide through suffering toward illumination: a testimony that saving knowledge can be gained only through trial, loneliness, and repentance.
It is not until Calvin that we encounter a reading of Job that resembles the modern approach.
In any case, here a summarized *paraphrase* of what appeared before The Book of Job in many Bibles:
PART II
Brief summary and paraphrase of the preface to the Moralia in Job by St Gregory used in Bibles to introduce Job.
1. On the fourfold sense of Scripture
The words of Holy Scripture are a river both shallow and deep — in which a lamb may walk and an elephant may swim. For it offers simple truths to the simple, yet lofty mysteries to the wise. Some books instruct by open teaching, others lift by hidden allegory; but in the book of blessed Job both are mingled together, so that while the plain words teach the history of patience, the hidden sense reveals the mysteries of the Redeemer.
In Holy Scripture there are four senses — historical, allegorical, moral, and anagogical. By history we learn what was done; by allegory, what is to be believed concerning Christ and His Church; by morality, what is to be done in our own life; and by anagogy, what is to be hoped for in the world to come.
2. The literal and mystical meaning in Job
The blessed Job, who is described as “a man of the land of Uz, simple and upright, fearing God and avoiding evil,” may be taken literally as a real man who endured many afflictions with patience. But in a higher sense he prefigures the Redeemer Himself, who, being made in the likeness of sinful flesh, was yet without sin.
When the devil smites Job’s substance, children, and body, it is a figure of the manifold sufferings of Christ — His disciples scattered, His members persecuted, His flesh wounded. Yet in all these things the devil, though he seems to prevail, is conquered; for even in afflicting he serves the purposes of God.
3. The triple sense to be applied
We must therefore read the book in three ways:
Historically, as the account of a man tried and restored.
Allegorically, as the mystery of Christ and His Church.
Morally, as the example of how each believer may bear adversity.
For Scripture, like a field, yields many fruits: it teaches by history, enlightens by allegory, corrects by morality, and lifts the mind by anagogy.
4. The harmony of the Old and New Testaments
All that is written in the Old Testament finds its fulfillment in the New. The very facts that outwardly belong to the ancient fathers are inwardly figures of Christ. Thus Job’s patience foretells the Passion of our Redeemer; his wife tempting him prefigures the carnal synagogue; his friends disputing, the heretics who wound by false consolations; and his restoration at the end signifies the glory of the resurrection.
5. On Job’s country, name, and character
Job lived in the land of Uz — a name signifying “counsel” or “advice” — because the Church of the Gentiles, which he represents, was long without divine counsel until it received it through faith. His name Job is interpreted “mourning,” for the Redeemer in His passion wept for the dead world. He was called “simple and upright”: simple in intention, upright in action; for the Redeemer was simple in innocence and upright in restoring fallen humanity.
6. On Job’s wealth and household
The wealth and household of Job — his seven sons and three daughters — mystically signify the perfection of the Church: seven denoting spiritual gifts, three denoting faith, hope, and charity. His thousands of sheep and camels, oxen and asses, represent the diversity of the faithful — some contemplative, some active, some strong in preaching, some humble in labor.
7. On Satan’s accusation and God’s permission
The enemy said, “Does Job serve God for nothing?” He accused Job, but through Job he accused all the righteous, suggesting that none serve God freely. Yet God permitted him to tempt, not to destroy, for by the patient endurance of His servant He would confound the enemy. Thus was prefigured the temptation of Christ, whom Satan tempted in the wilderness, yet could not overcome.
8. On the losses of Job
Job lost his wealth and his children, yet said, “The Lord gave and the Lord has taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord.” Here he foreshadowed Christ, who in His Passion lost the companionship of His disciples and the people He had chosen, yet blessed the Father, saying, “Father, into Thy hands I commend my spirit.” The enemy took away outward blessings, but could not rob inward grace.
9. On Job’s bodily affliction
When Job was smitten with sore boils, his body represents the body of Christ suffering in His members, or the Church tormented by persecutions. He sat among ashes — for the humility of the Redeemer descended to the dust of death, and the Church, mourning her sins, sits in penitence.
10. On Job’s wife and friends
Job’s wife tempting him signifies the voice of carnal reason, which persuades to despair: “Curse God and die.” His friends represent false teachers, who under color of consolation utter pride and error. Yet even through their words truth may shine, for Scripture often mingles the sayings of the foolish to prove the wise.
11. On Job’s patience and perfection
Job’s patience is not merely passive endurance but an active contest. He is struck outwardly, yet he conquers within. By not sinning with his lips he silences the adversary. In him we see the victory of grace over temptation. Patience is not weakness but strength restrained; it is the power of love that conquers pain.
12. The dialogue as the image of the Church
When Job’s friends dispute with him, the scene represents the Church’s own debates through the ages. Within her communion there are both the wise and the mistaken, and truth is often refined by contradiction. God allows contention so that faith may be tested, just as gold is proved in fire.
13. The voice of God from the whirlwind
When the Lord answers Job from the whirlwind, He signifies the mystery of the Incarnation. For the divine Word came veiled in mortal flesh, speaking to humanity amid the tempest of its weakness. The same voice which shakes creation gives peace to the heart that listens.
14. On Job’s restoration
Job’s final restoration after trial prefigures the resurrection. His double possession signifies that the reward of the saints shall surpass their former state, for grace abounds where sin had reigned. His renewed offspring symbolize the new generations of the faithful born of the Church after the Passion of the Lord.
15. The moral pattern of Job’s life
In the moral sense, Job is every righteous soul. His losses are our temptations; his sores, our secret griefs; his friends, the false comforts of worldly wisdom. Yet when the mind keeps faith amid affliction, it becomes richer than before. For outward loss purifies inward love.
16. The triple order of interpretation
Each reader must choose the path suited to grace:
The literal, for beginners;
The moral, for those advancing;
The mystical, for the perfect.
These are not three books but one revelation, rising like steps toward the vision of God.
17. The harmony of divine speech
Scripture never contradicts itself. What seems opposed on the surface unites at the summit. For one and the same Spirit breathes through all its writers. The rough places of the letter are smoothed by the charity of the interpreter.
18. Why Scripture speaks obscurely
The Lord has veiled His mysteries so that love might seek what the intellect cannot at once perceive. Hidden truth, when found, is sweeter; and the toil of searching purifies the heart. The divine Word is like a fountain covered by stone: it invites the humble to lift the weight and drink.
19. The necessity of contemplation and action
No one understands Job who is idle. As faith without works is dead, so study without obedience is vain. We must learn with the mind and practise with the life, joining Martha’s service to Mary’s contemplation. Then the wound of trial becomes the school of wisdom.
20. On divine and human speech
When God speaks, He enlightens; when man speaks rightly, it is God who speaks in him. Thus the author of the commentary must pray before he writes, lest his words be his own and not the Lord’s. To teach without prayer is to draw water from a dry well.
21. The humility required of interpreters
The deeper the mysteries, the humbler should be the expositor. Let him remember that even the greatest prophets saw only in part. Whoever exalts himself above Scripture falls beneath it; whoever bows beneath it is lifted up by it.
22. The usefulness of the literal sense
Some, loving allegory, despise the letter. But the literal sense is the foundation of all others; if it be removed, the spiritual building falls. Therefore first learn what the text says, then ascend to what it means. History leads us to mystery as the body bears the soul.
23. On allegory
In allegory the facts of the past reveal the mysteries of Christ. Egypt signifies the world; Israel, the faithful; Pharaoh, the devil; the Red Sea, baptism; the desert, temptation; the promised land, eternal life. So too, in Job, every circumstance speaks of the Redeemer’s passion and the Church’s pilgrimage.
24. On the moral sense
The moral sense applies the Scripture to ourselves. What Job endured outwardly we endure inwardly; what he overcame in body we must overcome in soul. The sores of the flesh are the vices of the heart; the scraping of the potsherd is the correction of repentance.
25. On the anagogical sense
The anagogical lifts us from earth to heaven, teaching what we are to hope for. Job’s final vision of God “with his eyes” prefigures the beatific vision promised to the pure in heart. Thus Scripture begins with conduct and ends in contemplation.
26. On the unity of Scripture and the Incarnate Word
All Scripture is one book, and that one book is Christ. Because He is the Word of God, every word of God speaks of Him. In Job wounded we see Christ suffering; in Job restored we see Christ glorified; in Job praying for his friends we see Christ interceding for His persecutors.
27. Why the righteous suffer
The good are often scourged in this life that they may be spared in the next. Their pain is medicine, not punishment. The wicked flourish because their reward is only here. Thus adversity is the sign of adoption; whom the Lord loves, He chastens.
28. On divine pedagogy
God teaches us as a physician, not as an enemy. He wounds to heal, troubles to teach. Job’s sores are the lessons of divine wisdom; each stripe reveals a virtue. The school of suffering is the mother of saints.
29. The end of all interpretation
The aim of every exposition is charity. Knowledge without love puffs up; love builds up. To know the words of Job is little; to imitate his patience is much; to love his Redeemer is all. When study ends in love, it fulfills both law and prophets.
30. Doxology and conclusion
Therefore, as we begin this work, we implore the same Lord who opened the mind of Job to open ours also, that He who spoke by the wounds of His servant may speak by the words of our weakness. To Him be glory who lives and reigns for ever. Amen.
PART III
A modernized truncated version.