The Spirit of the Devouring Mother Rises

Our Nation, the World, seems to be splitting apart, the forces becoming sharper, sides are being chosen.

Traditionalist author of The System of the Anti-Christ Charles Upton has some startling things to say these spiritual currents, he claims we live in the Kali Yuga, the last spiritual  cycle of the end times, 

“Following Rene Guenon in THE REIGN OF QUANTITY AND THE SIGNS OF THE TIMES, I accept, and see, that our era is under the sign of the Substantial Pole, the Feminine Principle as Destroyer....”

“The Pole of Essence, or quality is the archetype of the masculine principle, it is the origin of the hierarchical conception of being and the hierarchical organization of society. Under the regime of Substance, or quantity, however—the archetype of the feminine principle—vertical hierarchy is collapsed by a growing horizontal or “leveling” tendency...”

We see this leveling tendency where we have gone from a God enthroned King making political decisions, to a middle class elite, to a democracy of average Joe’s, finally privileging the lumpenproletariat.

This feminine reign is characterized by Materialism, “a collective obsession is born to annihilate all polarities, to achieve something like an earthly, material counterfeit of the Unity of God by eroding, denying, suppressing, and finally destroying all the true and necessary distinctions that make human life possible, including gender.”

This is clearly represented by Hilary Clinton, and the strange rise of Global Matriarchs and eunuchs.

Look at the men. Newly elected to France, Macron met his future wife in high school in Amiens. He was fifteen. She was twenty-four years older, married, with three children. She was his teacher. They have no children.

Or Leo Varadkar, gay son of an Indian immigrant, Irelands new Prime Minister.

Macron, May, & Merkel, Europe’s childless leaders, having no stake in the future, mirror their country’s own demographic decline.

German philosopher Rüdiger Safranski wrote:

"for the childless, thinking in terms of the generations to come loses relevance. Therefore, they behave more and more as if they were the last and see themselves as standing at the end of the chain".

"Europe is committing suicide. Or at least its leaders have decided to commit suicide", wrote Douglas Murray in The Times. "Europe today has little desire to reproduce itself, fight for itself or even take its own side in an argument". Murray, in his new book, entitled The Strange Death of Europe, called it "an existential civilisational tiredness".

Angela Merkel made the fatal decision to open the doors of Germany to one million and half migrants to stop the demographic winter of her country. It is not a coincidence that Merkel, who has no children, has been called "the compassionate mother" of migrants. 

In ‘Rule of the Global Eunuch’ The collapse of South Korea’s experiment with matriarchy confirms suspicions about the character of the global elite, Costin Vlad Alamariu records the impeachment of Park Geun-hye, the first female president of South Korea (and of anywhere in East Asia) in a bizarre scandal involving corruption, incompetence, and the occult , he thinks these leaders “serve the same function in the American regime that court eunuchs did in Oriental despotisms. Eunuchs, devoid of an identity and posterity of their own, were seen as the perfect loyal functionaries to carry out the will of a centralized bureaucratic tyranny. This is the distillation of “meritocracy,” and the modern total State apparently has plenty of virtual eunuchs to fill out the function in our time — and seems eager to promote many more.”

Socially, Women control the spending in our economy, even according to the generous numbers of Harvard University's studies -

Economically, women already spend 90% more money than they earn in the economy. They gobble up 66% of public spending from the welfare state while men pay 75% of the taxes to support this gynocentric system. Women make up 80% of all spending decisions in the materialistic, extremely wasteful and environmentally destructive economy.

Ok. Back to Upton,

“The more radical and conflictive the false polarizations operating in the latter days become, the more insistent is the call to do away with all distinctions so as to pacify these titanic conflicts—yet the denial of all sexual, cultural, ethnic and religious distinctions only further inflames and infuriates those forces which would falsely absolutize these distinctions, and set them at war. Thus an unholy alliance of false polarity and (in Guénon’s phrase) inverted hierarchy—the “Right”—and false unity and equality—the “Left”—brings the cycle of manifestation to a close.” 

The problem is that extreme egalitarianism & universalism breaks down distinctions that are necessary for meaning. 

So, Trump and Putin are the good guys, establishing a male patriarchal order & hierarchal distinctions that retain identity, right ?

Well, no. According to Upton, both are demonic.

“In the Book of Apocalypse, this polarization between and a false, imposed unity and various falsely absolutized distinctions is called  “Gog and Magog”—in the Qur’an,  “Yajuj and Majuj.” According to Apocalypse 20:7-8, “....when the thousand years are expired [the millennium during which the devil is bound, identified by Eastern Orthodox theologians as the church age], Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, and shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.” 

According to The Apocalypse of St. John: An Orthodox Commentary by Archbishop Averky of Jordanville, the meaning of Gog in Hebrew is “a gathering” or “one who gathers”, and of Magog “an exaltation” or “one who exalts”. “Exaltation” suggests the idea of transcendence as opposed to unity, “gathering” the idea of unity as opposed to transcendence. The implication, here, is that one of the deepest deceptions of Antichrist in the last days of the cycle will be to set these two integral aspects of the Absolute in opposition to each other in the collective mind, and on a global scale, in “the four quarters of the earth”. 

As for the economic and political expression of this barren satanic polarity, the false cohesion of left-wing tyranny, as well as today’s global capitalism, would fall under Gog, while both the false hierarchicalism of right-wing tyranny and the violent absolutism of the various “tribal” separatist movements opposed to globalism, both ethnic and religious, would come under Magog. 

In terms of religion, those liberal, historicist, evolutionist, quasi-materialist and crypto-Pagan theologies which emphasize God’s immanence as opposed to His transcendence are part of Gog, while those reactionary theologies which exalt transcendence over immanence, look on the material world as a vale of tears, denigrate the human body, and view the destruction of nature with indifference if not secret approval, since the best we can hope for is to get it all over with, are part of Magog. 

The conflict between the two is precisely the satanic counterfeit of the true eschatological conflict described in Apocalypse 19:11-20, between the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, and the Beast with his false prophet. Those who can be lured to fight in a counterfeit war between elements which ought to be reconciled, because they are essentially parts of the same reality as seen in a distorting mirror, will miss their call to fight in the true war between forces which neither should nor can be reconciled: those of the Truth and those of the Lie.  (Globalism, insofar as it sets the stage for the emergence of Guénon’s “inverted hierarchy,” also contains the seed of Magog, while tribalism, as the common inheritance of all who are excluded from the global elite, holds the seed of Gog: in the latter days, no party or class or sector can long retain its ideological stability; the “rate of contradiction” approaches the speed of light.)"

                                        A hero arises ?

"I believe that there is a true archetypal opposition between Traditionalism and Liberalism, which appears to be based on the cosmic functions of the masculine and feminine genders, or rather the masculine and feminine principles. This opposition seems to have been unveiled—for a brief moment at least—in the recent presidential election in the United States. 

Hillary Clinton and the contemporary “Liberal Left” represent a feminization of the U.S. population, as indicated by the LBGTQ agenda, but more fundamentally by a rejection of traditional American individualism in favor of an unapologetic allegiance to, and virtual worship of, the “Maternalistic State” such that her defeat produced something on the order of a “metaphysical panic” among her followers, as if their Goddess, their very principle of reality, had died."

"As for Trump and the “Populist Right”, he clearly represents a rebellion against the Maternalistic State on the part of those identified with various oppressed aspects of the Masculine Principle, which is now experiencing a resurgence, though presently expressing itself in some ways as a mere self-caricature. When any true Spiritual Masculinity lacks cultural expression, the only collective identities available to the mass of  men are—to use the common American high school slang—the “jock” and the “nerd”: the man whose only mode of self-expression is physical conflict and brutality, and the man whose masculinity is limited to the technological application of abstract thought.”

Jock and Nerd ? Doesn't this perfectly describe the Alt-right - a bunch of computer hackers on /pol/ teaming up with ulta-virile Fascist and White nationalists ? And isn't this precisely what they are doing - absolutizing race and tribe above spiritual principals ? This is understandable against the homogenizing, deracinated extremism of Universalist Christianity which refuse all aspects of nationality or ethnicity.

                           This is what the alt-right actually believes

“In the defeat of Hillary Clinton by Donald Trump, we may in fact be seeing a reflection (one of many past, possible, and to come) of the prophesy in the Book of the Apocalypse where a luxurious, self-indulgent maritime mercantile empire, ruled by the Whore of Babylon, is overthrown by the Beast, the Antichrist—the very picture of the rebellion of a perverted Masculine Principle against a degenerate Feminine Principle. 

I certainly do not mean to imply by this analogy that Donald Trump is in any sense the Antichrist in person, only that—despite whatever may be positive in his policies—he is one of the many mirrors that will temporarily reflect the Antichrist archetype. Antichrist himself must be the overt hierophant of the final Satanic religion, and Trump in no way satisfies this definition. This Gog-Magog opposition can be clearly discerned in the present fighting styles of the Left and the Right in the United States, where the weapons of choice of the Left are moral superiority and shame, those of the Right, anger and fear. Who can deny that these are the traditionally-preferred tactics in the perennial battle of the sexes?”

Sound far fetched ?The neo-nazi site, Daily Stormer, which gets over 500,000 daily views recently published this article about the break-down of reality - recognize the gal with the severed heads ? That’s Kali, which they conflate with the demonic feminine, in Hindu theology, it's important to note, this is NOT true of Kali.

The article cites complaints that are clearly signs of a wounded masculinity :

You are abandoned by your father because she was bored and destroyed your family. Because she was bored... 

You are a bastard.

You are addicted to internet pornography.

You have an immediate family member that is an open homosexual.

You engage regularly in semi-anonymous sex.

You cannot get a woman to have sex with you at all.

You cannot make a relationship work.

You are in your twenties or thirties, and still feel like a teenage boy.

You do not believe you will ever have a family or children.

You have gotten a girl pregnant, and she murdered your child before he or she was born.

You have bastard children.

You are overweight.

You are living with a woman and some other man’s child.

You will never own your own home.

You are an adult, and cartoons and/or video games are the most exciting part of your life.

And Mr. Upton makes it explicit that,

“this sort of polarization is between the masculine/Traditional and the feminine/Liberal, worldviews, the latter being the dominant myth of the European Union, and the former of the rising nationalist reactions against it...”

Part of this reaction is Islam. Feminist rail endlessly against "Rape culture" and yet....

Islam, particularly Saudi Arabia or Isis, stands for everything feminism abhors, patriarchy, female oppression, homophobia, but psychoanalyst Jordan Peterson notes that women support Islam because they crave male domination.

He points to 50 shades of Gray. Also notice the

 recent studies on the “Great Mystery: Why are So Many Women Searching for Ultraviolent Rape and Physical Abuse Porn?”

He notes that men test ideas and women test men. Western Man is failing woman’s “shit tests.” 

75% of all Muslim “refugees” are military age men. We all know that were these refugee’s big bosomed blondes there would be few feminist’s with welcoming signs.

Let’s not forget the constant scandals of woman Refugee workers having sex with minors at refugee camps. 

                               So, Sweden has changed....

So here we have Trump, standing against immigration, as the male principle opposing all this.

Now, which side ought you be on? Neither.

“The titanic conflict between the regime of Substance and the reaction against it—both of which are equally manifestations of the last days of the Kali-yuga—is symbolized in the Book of the Apocalypse by “Gog and Magog”, and in the Qur’an by “Yajuj and Majuj”—who, according to the latter source, will slither down every slope [Q. 21:96]. That is to say, both the universal leveling-power of Substance and the reactionary attempt to re-establish hierarchy in opposition to it will form part of the same universal sinking tendency that characterizes the final days of the cycle.....the latter days of the cycle are characterized by titanic conflicts between false alternatives which are ultimately expressions of the same universal degeneration...

However, the Book of the Apocalypse also presents us a picture of the true eschatological conflict of the latter days, a battle of which the false conflict between Gog and Magog is a mere caricature. ...To those who are able to place the will of God above both their own self-will and any worldly agenda—and the knowledge given by God above any worldly analysis—it may become possible (God willing) to play a role in the true eschatological, messianic conflict of the latter days: possible, and therefore necessary.”

The true war, Upton says, is not between Nationalism vs Globalism, Right vs Left, Christianity vs Islam....While affirming Muslms have no place in Christian lands, Mark Citadel puts it more globally :


"I am glad that there are those of Traditionalist persuasion in other religions who understand the tidal wave of what is essentially satanism that threatens the ENTIRE Traditional order, not just the Christian one which it has largely succeeded in overthrowing....

The differing religions of the world have always had friction between them, such is of course natural since all religions have political implications and where politics differs, conflict arises.

However, there is a greater threat which should be recognized by all, and it is a threat more insidious than anything like ISIS, because it often doesn’t need to use force to get its way. It is far more cunning, more like the deceiver himself than like Behemoth.

Across nations, there should be a consensus among religiously diverse societies and communities. The #1 threat to all Traditional religious practices, is Modernity. It doesn’t stop in Europe."

We ought to bring these issues out into the light, instead of letting them fester into the alt-right subterranean rage. Roger Scruton’s definition of a deplorable - someone who lives with the policies passed by a liberal. Otherwise, their grievances will be shouted done with accusations of “Nazi” & “KKK”, and these will be the only places that will hear them.

Cultural Marxism is just Global Homocapitalism

                           probably not what Stalin had in mind

“Cultural Marxism” is a umbrella term with the use of the critical theory of the Frankfurt School  for specific social transformation agendas, utilizing a similar dialectic as Marx with different actors.

Jonathan Chait has noted that the “modern far left has borrowed the Marxist critique of liberalism and substituted race and gender identities for economic ones.”

From the video below :

“Instead of the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat, between the haves and the have-nots, Cultural Marxism views such a conflict as existing between the oppressed and the oppressors; between those with privilege, and those without it.

The working class has been replaced by “minorities”. Majority groups are typically defined as privileged and oppressive, with minority groups accordingly labelled under-privileged and oppressed. Heterosexuals are oppressive. Cis-gender people are oppressive. Whites are oppressive. Especially white men. Christians are oppressive. Those that do not fit into these groups are thus considered “oppressed”.

It stands to reason, therefore, that:

If heterosexuals are oppressors, the solution is to encourage other forms of sexuality.

If whites are oppressors, the solution is racial diversity.

If cis-gender people are oppressors, the solution is to encourage transgenderism.

If Christians are oppressors, the solution is to propagate Islam.”

Ironically, this all serves the Global Capitalist agenda, Charles Upton notes how Cultural Marxism was used against the Revolutionary Liberation movements themselves :

"The Liberal Left has radically departed from the worldview and mores of the “traditional” U.S. Left of the 1980’s. In its elitism, its scorn for the working class, and its near-total suppression of class-based politics in favor a radical and dehumanizing social agenda based on race and gender, it begs for a new name—“Inverted Liberalism” perhaps? 

Nothing in fact is left of Leftist or Marxist ideology in the traditional sense but the mouthings of a strictly academic “Left”, totally alienated from any sort of working-class movement, where the ideologies of race and gender have completely replaced those of class. This development is largely the product of a deliberate co-optation, by the economic and political powers-that be, of the Left as it existed in the 1960’s, 70’s and 80’s. Feminist Gloria Steinham even confessed that Ms. Magazine, the major feminist publication of the 1970’s, received funding from the CIA, who well understood that if the social conflict between the rich and the poor could be re-defined as a conflict between the men and the women, the liberation movements of the second half of the 20th Century could be effectively suppressed—which they were."

Gay Liberation being so prominent among the New Left that these agendas have become so intwined as to inspire a new term: Homocapitalism.

In 1982 the Australian scholar Dennis Altman wrote:

“The real change in the past decade has been a mass political and cultural movement through which gay women and men have defined themselves as a new minority. This development was only possible under modern consumer capitalism, which for all its injustices has created the conditions for greater freedom and diversity than are present in any other society yet known. For those of us who are socialists, this presents an important political dilemma, namely how to guard those qualities of capitalism that allow for individual diversity while jettisoning its inequities, exploitation, waste, and ugliness.”

On the social function of liberating Eros Zygmunt Bauman has remarked that

The great majority of people ± men as well as women ± are today integrated through seduction rather than policing, advertising rather than indoctrinating, need- creation rather than normative regulation.

Free- floating eroticism is therefore eminently suitable for the task of tending to the kind of identity which, like all other postmodern cultural products, is (in George Steiner's memorable words) calculated for `maximal impact and instant obsolescence'. 

The overall outcome is the rapid emaciation of human relations, stripping them of intimacy and emotionality, and the wilting of the desire to enter them and keep them alive. 

The weakening of bonds is an important condition of successful social production of sensation-gatherers who happen as well to be fully ̄edged, effective consumers." 

Baudrillard, who conceives of feminism as merely the liberation of productive forces, analogous to the movement within capitalism whereby the serf is emancipated as worker in order to be more efficiently exploited. The sexual revolution has been successful in ensuring that misery and alienation migrate into sexuality, and that the emancipated forms of sexuality valorized by many feminists are in fact what capitalism requires of us in the contemporary marketplace.

John Milbank explains,

“Liberalism, then, drives the attempt to displace the heterosexual norm – which leads to the (shockingly illiberal) criminalisation of those who do not endorse either gay practice or gay marriage. But liberalism includes capitalism: in the end, liberalism defines people as simply property-owners, narcissistic self-owners, choosers and consumers. Aquinas thought that our natural orientation to something outside ourselves was fundamental to our being. Liberalism, by contrast, denies the importance of relationships. Thereby it encourages the undoing of community, locality and beauty – and also marriage and the family.

And there is, naturally, money to be made out of all this. Husbands, wives, children and adolescents (this last an invention of the market) are more effective and exploitable consumers when they are isolated. Fluctuating identities and fluid preferences, including as to sexual orientation, consume still more, more often and more variously in terms of products and services.”

Scott Schaffer at the Journal of Mundane Behavior comments on this postmodern liberated subject,

“Hence this obsessive quest for gender (“he makes me feel like a woman”) at both the prosaic end of the everyday and the more rarefied space of radical feminist theory. This endless commutability of signifiers was what capitalism wanted all along, not merely profit or exchange-value.”